Introduction
Last night I spent some time with the Ledaig 10 years scotch. Ledaig [led-chig] scotch whisky is distilled on the Island of Mull at the Tobermory distillery. Ledaig uses a peated malt (peated to 35-40 ppm?), while Tobermory whisky uses unpeated malt (although there is apparently peat in the water source). I purchased this bottle locally for $43, which puts it in the same range as whiskies like Laphroaig 10, Bunnahabhain 12, Clynelish 14, Glenfarclass 12, and Macallan Cask Strength. The Ledaig wasn’t really on my radar, but I saw the video review of this from PeatLuvr on YouTube (link below) and decided I wanted to try it. [Weird – The small image to the right looks much greener on my screen than the full size image when you click on it]
Tasting notes
My first impression upon putting the glass to my nose is of rubber (sulphur?), like when you’re standing in a tire store. It’s a pungent smell that makes me want to pull away immediately. Now, if I go back four or five times for additional sniffs, I seem to be able to get past that first impression. The rubber starts turning to egg, and there’s a sweetness with it, along with lemon zest. There’s also definitely a very present peat component. However, if I put the glass down for a little bit and come back to it…Boom, there’s that pungent rubber again. I’ve had this a few times and it takes me a while to get used to the nose each time.
On the palate, things pick up for me. Strong peat (this is what I bought it for), along with a peppery heat. That’s better. On the finish, that pepper sticks on the tongue a bit, but there’s also some alcohol burn. This one really seems young and temperamental both on the nose and finish. I also get a little bit of that rubber again coming up through the nostrils with the peat at the end.
Conclusion – I’m a little mixed on this one. I think there’s something about the output from the Tobermory distillery that doesn’t quite sit right with me. I’ve tried a Tobermory before as well, and thought there was something slightly “off”, maybe a bit sulphury again. It’s not a total loss, as I do enjoy the peat/pepper explosion on the palate. For general drinking of this bottle, I think I’m going to relegate it to tumblers and not spend much time nosing it. I also need to try adding a little water to see how that changes it. I’ll drink this bottle, but don’t have any plans to purchase another any time soon. There are a lot of other peaty malts out there that I enjoy more.
Other opinions
- Whisky Magazine – Dave Broom and Arthur Motley provide their impressions and scores. Neither one of them mentions rubber or sulphur, although Arthur does talk about the sweet egg smell.
- Whisky Pages – Some info on the distillery, as well as tasting notes and rating. These guys seem pretty positive on the Ledaig 10, not mentioning any particular negatives. They give it a fairly average score, though.
- YouTube (PeatLuver) – Tom really likes it, and doesn’t seem to take any offense to the pungent nose. Where I get rubber/sulphur, then sweet egg product, he gets “fruity”. Maybe I just have a mental block based on my first impression (tire store).
I tried this one for the first time as 10 year old Ardbeg is very hard to find at a reasonable price any more and Tesco had this one on offer at £22.50.
I found the Ledaig remarkably similar to the Ardbeg and mine didn’t smell or taste at all rubbery, just peaty but without the iodine taste of Ardbeg. A long, sweet finish if you add a dash of water.
A first rate scotch and I’m a fan at first sip!
Interesting take on this one. Ardbeg without the iodine, huh?
I’m going to have to revisit the Ledaig, as I don’t think I’ve had any since this post. I’ve had quite a few other whiskies over the past three months. It will be interesting to see if my reaction to this one has changed.
Thanks for the comments!
Jeff
When I first began drinking Scotch I found a review of Glenmorangie 10- that is an excellent introductory whisky. Peatluvr, on the other hand, is out of his mind declaring Ledaig “smooth”; do not introduce somebody to Scotch through Ledaig. As for wood – it’s there, but think pine not oak. Many people pick up rubber, for better or worse.
I’ve seen this Tom fellow make good reviews – he clearly is honest about what he percieves. While Ledaig is not fruity, I like his desription of color. It does burn the center of your tongue – that is where you register sour and in this case acidic sensations. He is right about the whisky not being medicinal. Grassy and seabreeze, to be sure. It is a lighter bodied malt, despite the punch of peat. Lightness or fullness of body does not necessarily imply anything about the fullness of a whisky’s flavor.
Ledaig is bold. To personify, Ledaig 10 probably doesn’t care if you like it or not. It is very rough around the edges, but charming in its own way.
At the end of the day, it’s all about taste… so do not take a singular review for granted.
Thanks for the great comments / notes, Thomas! Keep in mind that since I wrote about this one, Tobermory has significantly updated their line, including the Ledaigs. The 10 year is now bottled at 46% and is non-chill filtered. I’m curious to see how it compares, but not sure I want to buy a whole bottle to find out. 🙂
Cheers,
Jeff