<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scotch Hobbyist&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glenfarclas 1953 58 Year Single Cask Review by Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2012/05/25/glenfarclas-1953-58-year-single-cask-review/#comment-2662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2479#comment-2662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen a couple of reviews now that mention a &quot;meatiness&quot;, including one who attributed that meatiness to a potential sulphur influence. I&#039;m thinking this is where my humble nose-to-brain process found a slight &quot;mustiness&quot; rather than the &quot;meatiness&quot; others are describing. And where I subtracted a point or two, others find it to be a perfectly pleasing addition to the complex nose. 

I admit, I&#039;m a bit slow to catch the meaty train when it comes to whisky flavor descriptors. Expressions that are often described as having meat-related tastes and smells just don&#039;t come across that way to me.

Just a little insight into my own personal biases and flaws...

Cheers,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a couple of reviews now that mention a &#8220;meatiness&#8221;, including one who attributed that meatiness to a potential sulphur influence. I&#8217;m thinking this is where my humble nose-to-brain process found a slight &#8220;mustiness&#8221; rather than the &#8220;meatiness&#8221; others are describing. And where I subtracted a point or two, others find it to be a perfectly pleasing addition to the complex nose. </p>
<p>I admit, I&#8217;m a bit slow to catch the meaty train when it comes to whisky flavor descriptors. Expressions that are often described as having meat-related tastes and smells just don&#8217;t come across that way to me.</p>
<p>Just a little insight into my own personal biases and flaws&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glenfarclas 1953 58 Year Single Cask Review by Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2012/05/25/glenfarclas-1953-58-year-single-cask-review/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2479#comment-2661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that is the going price for this bottle! $8000 more than their 1953 Family Cask 54 year bottle. On the other hand, it&#039;s half what The Macallan is charging for their latest 60 year old. Plus, Glenfarclas makes their standard 40 year available for less than $500. All in all, I figure we can cut them some slack on this one extravagantly priced &quot;collectible.&quot; :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is the going price for this bottle! $8000 more than their 1953 Family Cask 54 year bottle. On the other hand, it&#8217;s half what The Macallan is charging for their latest 60 year old. Plus, Glenfarclas makes their standard 40 year available for less than $500. All in all, I figure we can cut them some slack on this one extravagantly priced &#8220;collectible.&#8221; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glenfarclas 1953 58 Year Single Cask Review by theTim</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2012/05/25/glenfarclas-1953-58-year-single-cask-review/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theTim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2479#comment-2660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is that price right? $10k a bottle?

yowza.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that price right? $10k a bottle?</p>
<p>yowza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Richard Paterson Experience &#8211; Tasting 1868 Dalmore by Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2012/05/20/dalmore-1868/#comment-2659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2452#comment-2659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ian! Trying to get a little better on the posting frequency. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ian! Trying to get a little better on the posting frequency. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Richard Paterson Experience &#8211; Tasting 1868 Dalmore by Ian</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2012/05/20/dalmore-1868/#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2452#comment-2645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been waiting for the second part to come out for awhile now. Excellent read and what a great experience for you. Thank you for sharing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting for the second part to come out for awhile now. Excellent read and what a great experience for you. Thank you for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whyte and Mackay &#8211; The Sample Room by The Richard Paterson Experience &#8211; Tasting 1868 Dalmore &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2012/03/04/whyte-mackay-the-sample-room/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Richard Paterson Experience &#8211; Tasting 1868 Dalmore &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2423#comment-2644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &amp; Mackay sample room, with Richard Paterson having just joined myself and Craig McGill. From my previous post on visiting the Whyte &amp; Mackay [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp; Mackay sample room, with Richard Paterson having just joined myself and Craig McGill. From my previous post on visiting the Whyte &amp; Mackay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on At long last&#8230;Mackinlay&#8217;s Shackleton whisky replica by Thom N</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2011/10/31/mackinlays-shackleton-whisky-replica/#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thom N]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2336#comment-2634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m from Australia, but I tend to order the limited whiskies that I can&#039;t readily source &quot;in country&quot; such as this and the Glenfidditch Age of Discovery through websites such as singlemaltdirect.com and thewhiskyexchange.com, although I&#039;m not sure how they go with customs in America. I personally haven&#039;t had an issue with customs here in Australia though, so you might want to give that a try?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from Australia, but I tend to order the limited whiskies that I can&#8217;t readily source &#8220;in country&#8221; such as this and the Glenfidditch Age of Discovery through websites such as singlemaltdirect.com and thewhiskyexchange.com, although I&#8217;m not sure how they go with customs in America. I personally haven&#8217;t had an issue with customs here in Australia though, so you might want to give that a try?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Octomore 2009 Bottling &#8211; How about a sampler? by Capn Jimbo's Rum Project</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/08/11/octomore_2009_bottling/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capn Jimbo's Rum Project]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1098#comment-2629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really think the doctor who inseminated the Octomom should be held accountable.  Oops, wrong thread.  As a peat lover (The Rum Project likes whisky too), I am intrigued by this release...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think the doctor who inseminated the Octomom should be held accountable.  Oops, wrong thread.  As a peat lover (The Rum Project likes whisky too), I am intrigued by this release&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Johnnie Walker Gold vs Blue by EricH</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2010/08/01/johnnie-walker-gold-vs-blue/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EricH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 21:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1930#comment-2627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep in mind the Glenlivet Nadurra is the cheapest cask strength single malt whisky on the market so it is my choice for introducing beginners to the style.  It&#039;s definitely my favorite of the Glenlivet range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind the Glenlivet Nadurra is the cheapest cask strength single malt whisky on the market so it is my choice for introducing beginners to the style.  It&#8217;s definitely my favorite of the Glenlivet range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Isle of Jura 1976 Feith A Chaorainn by whiskycritic@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2012/03/25/isle-of-jura-1976-feith-a-chaorainn/#comment-2561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whiskycritic@gmail.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=2442#comment-2561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed it&#039;s a shame about the price.  It&#039;d be great to be able to try a sample of this sometime.  It sounds like an interesting combination of simple and complex.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it&#8217;s a shame about the price.  It&#8217;d be great to be able to try a sample of this sometime.  It sounds like an interesting combination of simple and complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
