<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diageo Special Releases 2009: Caol Ila Unpeated 10 year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Paul,
Thanks for the comment! Great notes in your blog post, too. Caol Ila DE was one of my biggest disappointments this year. I really love Caol Ila in general, and I enjoy the Talisker and Lagavulin DEs very much. Unfortunately, the CI DE seemed to lose all of its Caol Ila-ness in the process of the wine finishing. After a few sips, all I could taste was the wine finish itself!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,<br />
Thanks for the comment! Great notes in your blog post, too. Caol Ila DE was one of my biggest disappointments this year. I really love Caol Ila in general, and I enjoy the Talisker and Lagavulin DEs very much. Unfortunately, the CI DE seemed to lose all of its Caol Ila-ness in the process of the wine finishing. After a few sips, all I could taste was the wine finish itself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Potts</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul R. Potts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-1440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m happy to see this whisky getting some attention -- I think it is fantastic, and just reviewed it myself. I was disappointed with recent bottles of Caol Ila 12 and the Distiller&#039;s Edition, but this one restores my faith in Caol Ila. Just so clean and rock-candy-like! That makes it sound too sweet, but the sugars are quite &quot;burnt&quot; and nutty like the toasted pecans on a pecan pie, and that keeps it from being too cloying. It really is a great example of how flavor isn&#039;t always all about old whiskies, and Islay isn&#039;t always about peat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to see this whisky getting some attention &#8212; I think it is fantastic, and just reviewed it myself. I was disappointed with recent bottles of Caol Ila 12 and the Distiller&#8217;s Edition, but this one restores my faith in Caol Ila. Just so clean and rock-candy-like! That makes it sound too sweet, but the sugars are quite &#8220;burnt&#8221; and nutty like the toasted pecans on a pecan pie, and that keeps it from being too cloying. It really is a great example of how flavor isn&#8217;t always all about old whiskies, and Islay isn&#8217;t always about peat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-1280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment Lawrence! I didn&#039;t buy any backup bottles, and don&#039;t have much of mine left. Maybe there will be some extra allocation for the U.S and we&#039;ll get a few bottles here in AZ later in the season. Glad to hear you&#039;re able to grab a couple of backups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Lawrence! I didn&#8217;t buy any backup bottles, and don&#8217;t have much of mine left. Maybe there will be some extra allocation for the U.S and we&#8217;ll get a few bottles here in AZ later in the season. Glad to hear you&#8217;re able to grab a couple of backups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawrence b</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lawrence b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-1270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s as flavorful as any of the tasting notes suggest.  I like the full strength... something about getting older makes the taste buds require a stronger tang, but I think I&#039;d like the clean taste at regular strength.  It&#039;s brandy for adults I described it once.  Amazing tones, overtones, hints for something that was single cask.

I&#039;ll be back!

BTW, it&#039;s hit Ann Arbor.  But, as I type this, I&#039;m making plans to buy two more bottles.  Don&#039;t want to risk any of you hitting my favorite scotch-monger before I get the chance to stock up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s as flavorful as any of the tasting notes suggest.  I like the full strength&#8230; something about getting older makes the taste buds require a stronger tang, but I think I&#8217;d like the clean taste at regular strength.  It&#8217;s brandy for adults I described it once.  Amazing tones, overtones, hints for something that was single cask.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be back!</p>
<p>BTW, it&#8217;s hit Ann Arbor.  But, as I type this, I&#8217;m making plans to buy two more bottles.  Don&#8217;t want to risk any of you hitting my favorite scotch-monger before I get the chance to stock up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Tim...hopefully everybody has the luxury of rating based on THEIR enjoyment. I promise any ratings I give are just an attempt to share how I like whiskies relative to others I&#039;ve tried. I don&#039;t believe in &quot;universal&quot; ratings.

Although...I&#039;m starting to lose track of some of my own ratings. I&#039;m going to post a Google App spreadsheet with my ratings so that I can keep track of them. 

Who knows, once I&#039;ve tried enough whiskies, I might need to reset my scale. I tried to leave some room at the top when I got started.

Those are some great whiskies you mentioned for your top tier! I really want to try the Laphroaig 25, but the price is so out there. 

We&#039;ve talked about it before, but we seem to have very similar tastes. So...when are you going to start your own blog so I can keep track and discover some new goodies to try?

Thanks,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Tim&#8230;hopefully everybody has the luxury of rating based on THEIR enjoyment. I promise any ratings I give are just an attempt to share how I like whiskies relative to others I&#8217;ve tried. I don&#8217;t believe in &#8220;universal&#8221; ratings.</p>
<p>Although&#8230;I&#8217;m starting to lose track of some of my own ratings. I&#8217;m going to post a Google App spreadsheet with my ratings so that I can keep track of them. </p>
<p>Who knows, once I&#8217;ve tried enough whiskies, I might need to reset my scale. I tried to leave some room at the top when I got started.</p>
<p>Those are some great whiskies you mentioned for your top tier! I really want to try the Laphroaig 25, but the price is so out there. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve talked about it before, but we seem to have very similar tastes. So&#8230;when are you going to start your own blog so I can keep track and discover some new goodies to try?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim D</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve had a number of &quot;better&quot; ones - but I have the luxury of rating them based on MY enjoyment - not what other&#039;s would expect.

In terms of what I liked better, I think the Lagavulin DE-16-21, Ardbeg Beast, Ugadail &amp; Supernova, Talisker DE, Laphroaig 25, GlenMo Signet, a couple of older Macallens, a Signatory Caol Ila and a few others would square off with this one very nicely - or beat it.

It&#039;s just something that rubs me the right way - probably like it did for you.  I can certainly see why it only scores mid-to-upper 80&#039;s for folks who&#039;ve been at this longer than I have.  As you noted, it&#039;s lack of complexity can be a huge liability for long-term aficionados of scotch - because that&#039;s what the &#039;pros&#039; look for.  But in this case, it&#039;s just got that unique element that defies it&#039;s simplicity and hugely appeals to my personal pallet. 

Thanks for the review - I wouldn&#039;t have worked so hard to get it had you not talked it up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a number of &#8220;better&#8221; ones &#8211; but I have the luxury of rating them based on MY enjoyment &#8211; not what other&#8217;s would expect.</p>
<p>In terms of what I liked better, I think the Lagavulin DE-16-21, Ardbeg Beast, Ugadail &amp; Supernova, Talisker DE, Laphroaig 25, GlenMo Signet, a couple of older Macallens, a Signatory Caol Ila and a few others would square off with this one very nicely &#8211; or beat it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just something that rubs me the right way &#8211; probably like it did for you.  I can certainly see why it only scores mid-to-upper 80&#8242;s for folks who&#8217;ve been at this longer than I have.  As you noted, it&#8217;s lack of complexity can be a huge liability for long-term aficionados of scotch &#8211; because that&#8217;s what the &#8216;pros&#8217; look for.  But in this case, it&#8217;s just got that unique element that defies it&#8217;s simplicity and hugely appeals to my personal pallet. </p>
<p>Thanks for the review &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t have worked so hard to get it had you not talked it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Last Minute Gift Ideas &#171; Whisk(e)y Apostle</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Last Minute Gift Ideas &#171; Whisk(e)y Apostle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to be posting their ideas for whisk(e)y related holiday gifts.  While I&#8217;m hoping for some of Diageo&#8217;s Special Release Caol Ila 10yo (Unpeated), I figured it would be nice to share what some of our friends in the blogosphere are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be posting their ideas for whisk(e)y related holiday gifts.  While I&#8217;m hoping for some of Diageo&#8217;s Special Release Caol Ila 10yo (Unpeated), I figured it would be nice to share what some of our friends in the blogosphere are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s awesome you were able to get a couple of bottles at $50 each. Congratulations! 

Thanks for taking the time to share your great notes here. Good call on the Zots! I&#039;d completely forgotten about those, but that&#039;s a great way to describe the &quot;fizziness&quot; I was talking about.

So...at 93 points for this, what have you had that you would rate higher?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s awesome you were able to get a couple of bottles at $50 each. Congratulations! </p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to share your great notes here. Good call on the Zots! I&#8217;d completely forgotten about those, but that&#8217;s a great way to describe the &#8220;fizziness&#8221; I was talking about.</p>
<p>So&#8230;at 93 points for this, what have you had that you would rate higher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim D</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK - I&#039;ve got my bottle, and at $50 locally it was a steal.  I&#039;ll give away my impression by telling you I&#039;ve wasted no time in picking up another.

I LOVE Caol Ila - and I realized that much of the taste profile I&#039;m enamored with does NOT come from the peat!  There&#039;s an &quot;ashen&quot; taste that I enjoy that every CI has, and this one is no exception.  The lemony/zesty and herbal appeal is all still in there.  In fact it loses virtually nothing without the peat - and the high ABV and racy 10 year age goes a long way for me.

Remember the candies called Zots?  Hard candy that was all citrusy and zippy, but had this almost hydrogen-peroxide like foaming center?  That&#039;s what this reminds me of.  It&#039;s utterly delicious.

I don&#039;t know how CI takes the *same* ingredients all the other distilleries use and manage to come up with something this unique by TAKING SOMETHING AWAY that appears in the standard expression - but they did it.

Home run - a 93 from me.  How weird is it that the younger the CI, the better they taste?  Seems true for a number of whiskies I&#039;ve had lately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; I&#8217;ve got my bottle, and at $50 locally it was a steal.  I&#8217;ll give away my impression by telling you I&#8217;ve wasted no time in picking up another.</p>
<p>I LOVE Caol Ila &#8211; and I realized that much of the taste profile I&#8217;m enamored with does NOT come from the peat!  There&#8217;s an &#8220;ashen&#8221; taste that I enjoy that every CI has, and this one is no exception.  The lemony/zesty and herbal appeal is all still in there.  In fact it loses virtually nothing without the peat &#8211; and the high ABV and racy 10 year age goes a long way for me.</p>
<p>Remember the candies called Zots?  Hard candy that was all citrusy and zippy, but had this almost hydrogen-peroxide like foaming center?  That&#8217;s what this reminds me of.  It&#8217;s utterly delicious.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how CI takes the *same* ingredients all the other distilleries use and manage to come up with something this unique by TAKING SOMETHING AWAY that appears in the standard expression &#8211; but they did it.</p>
<p>Home run &#8211; a 93 from me.  How weird is it that the younger the CI, the better they taste?  Seems true for a number of whiskies I&#8217;ve had lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/12/12/caol-ila-unpeated-10/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1553#comment-873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tim,
Good to see you here again. It sounds like you&#039;re set to enjoy some good drams. Mmm...14 yr. Caol Ila.

$50 for the CI Unpeated is awesome, but the Shopper&#039;s Vineyard price is pretty close. Especially if you can defray the shipping cost with a couple more bottles. Don&#039;t wait too long!

I need to go through all of the comments in that WTJK post. Right now, I plan on drinking some Secret Stills 2.2 (40 year Cragganmore) and definitely some Glenfarclas 17, as it just plain tastes like Christmas.

Maybe I&#039;ll switch to bourbon for New Year&#039;s Eve. Jefferson&#039;s Presidential Reserve 17 yr and William Larue Weller should hit the spot.

Have a great Holidays!
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,<br />
Good to see you here again. It sounds like you&#8217;re set to enjoy some good drams. Mmm&#8230;14 yr. Caol Ila.</p>
<p>$50 for the CI Unpeated is awesome, but the Shopper&#8217;s Vineyard price is pretty close. Especially if you can defray the shipping cost with a couple more bottles. Don&#8217;t wait too long!</p>
<p>I need to go through all of the comments in that WTJK post. Right now, I plan on drinking some Secret Stills 2.2 (40 year Cragganmore) and definitely some Glenfarclas 17, as it just plain tastes like Christmas.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll switch to bourbon for New Year&#8217;s Eve. Jefferson&#8217;s Presidential Reserve 17 yr and William Larue Weller should hit the spot.</p>
<p>Have a great Holidays!<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

