<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diageo 2009 Special Releases: Talisker 25 and 30 (plus the 18 year)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Norbert!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Norbert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #51: That's a Big Bottle of Ardbeg &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best in Blog #51: That's a Big Bottle of Ardbeg &#124; Whisky Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hobbyist has a fantastic post (as always) comparing Talisker 18 to the new Diageo 2009 Special Release Talisker 25 and 30 year olds.  Sorry to say though he doesn&#8217;t have any of those great charts he usually whips [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hobbyist has a fantastic post (as always) comparing Talisker 18 to the new Diageo 2009 Special Release Talisker 25 and 30 year olds.  Sorry to say though he doesn&#8217;t have any of those great charts he usually whips [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotchwhiskyblog</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scotchwhiskyblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice rewiev,nice blog.

Norbert]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice rewiev,nice blog.</p>
<p>Norbert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gal. Yeah...I think you&#039;d like the Talisker 18, even though it&#039;s not quite as in your face as the 10 year. I do find the 18 to be more complex and balanced than the 10, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gal. Yeah&#8230;I think you&#8217;d like the Talisker 18, even though it&#8217;s not quite as in your face as the 10 year. I do find the 18 to be more complex and balanced than the 10, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Diageo 2009 Special Releases: Talisker 25 and 30 (plus the 18 year) « Scotch Hobbyist’s Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Diageo 2009 Special Releases: Talisker 25 and 30 (plus the 18 year) « Scotch Hobbyist’s Blog -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Scotch Hobbyist and Ruben, scotchhunter. scotchhunter said: #scotch #whisky Diageo 2009 Special Releases: Talisker 25 and 30 (plus the 18 year) http://ow.ly/165F1m [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Scotch Hobbyist and Ruben, scotchhunter. scotchhunter said: #scotch #whisky Diageo 2009 Special Releases: Talisker 25 and 30 (plus the 18 year) <a href="http://ow.ly/165F1m" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/165F1m</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the notes on the cask types, Ruben. I&#039;m not completely sure what to make of this wording from http://www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk/talisker30yearold.htm: &quot;aged for 30 years in American Oak and European Oak refill casks.&quot;

Does refill apply to both, or just European Oak?

Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the notes on the cask types, Ruben. I&#8217;m not completely sure what to make of this wording from <a href="http://www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk/talisker30yearold.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.scotchmaltwhisky.co.uk/talisker30yearold.htm</a>: &#8220;aged for 30 years in American Oak and European Oak refill casks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does refill apply to both, or just European Oak?</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gal</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jeff,

very nice and thorough review of the 3 as usual. i am a great fan of the Taliskers. i need to get me the 18...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff,</p>
<p>very nice and thorough review of the 3 as usual. i am a great fan of the Taliskers. i need to get me the 18&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WhiskyNotes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I made a mistake myself:
... but if they state “American (!) Oak” without explicitly stating “refill”, it will be an ex-bourbon cask.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I made a mistake myself:<br />
&#8230; but if they state “American (!) Oak” without explicitly stating “refill”, it will be an ex-bourbon cask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/11/28/talisker-25-and-30-2009/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WhiskyNotes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=1497#comment-759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jeff, interesting comparison! 

A few words about the oak types though: if they say &quot;American Oak and European Oak refill casks&quot;, it&#039;s not the same as &quot;American and European Oak refill casks&quot;. In the first case, the American Oak previously held bourbon (and is not a refill cask), in the second case it held sherry. Both American and European Oak can be used to obtain a sherry refill cask, but if they state &quot;European Oak&quot; without explicitly stating &quot;refill&quot;, it will be an ex-bourbon cask. 

I believe Talisker 25yo and 30yo are a mixture of ex-bourbon and ex-sherry casks, not a mixture of refill sherry casks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff, interesting comparison! </p>
<p>A few words about the oak types though: if they say &#8220;American Oak and European Oak refill casks&#8221;, it&#8217;s not the same as &#8220;American and European Oak refill casks&#8221;. In the first case, the American Oak previously held bourbon (and is not a refill cask), in the second case it held sherry. Both American and European Oak can be used to obtain a sherry refill cask, but if they state &#8220;European Oak&#8221; without explicitly stating &#8220;refill&#8221;, it will be an ex-bourbon cask. </p>
<p>I believe Talisker 25yo and 30yo are a mixture of ex-bourbon and ex-sherry casks, not a mixture of refill sherry casks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

