<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black Bottle 10 year &#8211; leave your notion of blends at the door.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/09/black-bottle-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/09/black-bottle-10/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch drinkers</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/09/black-bottle-10/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch drinkers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=873#comment-1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best In Blog #17: Whisky News and Tasting Notes on the Web &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/09/black-bottle-10/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best In Blog #17: Whisky News and Tasting Notes on the Web &#124; Whisky Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=873#comment-218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hobbyist rather enjoyed his tasting of Black Bottle 10 (I found the NAS less [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hobbyist rather enjoyed his tasting of Black Bottle 10 (I found the NAS less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskyparty</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/09/black-bottle-10/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whiskyparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=873#comment-214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting review.  I&#039;m in the opposite situation as you - the NAS is the only bottle I can find here in NYC, I&#039;ve yet to see the 10 year anywhere.

From your notes, the tastes seem mostly similar, although you indicate a much heavier smoke profile than I found on the NAS.  That was my biggest hangup.  I know Bunnahabhain is the &quot;base&quot; Isaly in the blend, but I was really looking for a much smokier blend.  

As cheap as it was, it just didn&#039;t have enough of a traditionally strong Islay flavor for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting review.  I&#8217;m in the opposite situation as you &#8211; the NAS is the only bottle I can find here in NYC, I&#8217;ve yet to see the 10 year anywhere.</p>
<p>From your notes, the tastes seem mostly similar, although you indicate a much heavier smoke profile than I found on the NAS.  That was my biggest hangup.  I know Bunnahabhain is the &#8220;base&#8221; Isaly in the blend, but I was really looking for a much smokier blend.  </p>
<p>As cheap as it was, it just didn&#8217;t have enough of a traditionally strong Islay flavor for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/09/black-bottle-10/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=873#comment-210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike,
So far, I haven&#039;t been able to find BB NAS here in AZ, so I can&#039;t provide a value comparison. However, for under $40, I don&#039;t think you can go wrong with giving BB 10 a try.

From your posts on whiskyparty.net, I would think worst case you would give this somewhere in the 7.8 to 8.0 score range. Possibly much higher. You could always add a few drops of your Uigeadail to energize it and give it a longer finish.

Thanks,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,<br />
So far, I haven&#8217;t been able to find BB NAS here in AZ, so I can&#8217;t provide a value comparison. However, for under $40, I don&#8217;t think you can go wrong with giving BB 10 a try.</p>
<p>From your posts on whiskyparty.net, I would think worst case you would give this somewhere in the 7.8 to 8.0 score range. Possibly much higher. You could always add a few drops of your Uigeadail to energize it and give it a longer finish.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dodgydrammer</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/09/black-bottle-10/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dodgydrammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=873#comment-209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the review; I&#039;ve always wondered if the 10 yo is worth buying over the NAS.  Its a shame that this question will soon no longer be relevant.  I have seen this bottle on shelves around Chicago, so hopefully I&#039;ll get to try a bottle.
-mike ef]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review; I&#8217;ve always wondered if the 10 yo is worth buying over the NAS.  Its a shame that this question will soon no longer be relevant.  I have seen this bottle on shelves around Chicago, so hopefully I&#8217;ll get to try a bottle.<br />
-mike ef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

