<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dalmore 12 years old (The new one)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Jeff,

sounds like I&#039;ll have to get a hold of a sample of the Mackenzie then!
I actually thought that the Cigar Malt was an entirely different Whisky. Well, that sucks.

Great blog by the way, you have a new regular reader!

Martin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jeff,</p>
<p>sounds like I&#8217;ll have to get a hold of a sample of the Mackenzie then!<br />
I actually thought that the Cigar Malt was an entirely different Whisky. Well, that sucks.</p>
<p>Great blog by the way, you have a new regular reader!</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-1590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Martin,
Thanks for the comments. I&#039;m with you on bottling at 46-48%. The higher % of Dalmore Mackenzie is probably one of the factors that inspired me to rate that as an &quot;A&quot; whisky vs a &quot;B&quot; whisky.

If I find a dusty bottle of their Cigar Malt (predecessor to Gran Reserva) in a liquor store somewhere, I&#039;ll definitely grab it and see if the extra 3% abv brings anything to the table. They had bottled it at 43%, but lowered it to 40% when they renamed it Gran Reserva. :-(

Cheers,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin,<br />
Thanks for the comments. I&#8217;m with you on bottling at 46-48%. The higher % of Dalmore Mackenzie is probably one of the factors that inspired me to rate that as an &#8220;A&#8221; whisky vs a &#8220;B&#8221; whisky.</p>
<p>If I find a dusty bottle of their Cigar Malt (predecessor to Gran Reserva) in a liquor store somewhere, I&#8217;ll definitely grab it and see if the extra 3% abv brings anything to the table. They had bottled it at 43%, but lowered it to 40% when they renamed it Gran Reserva. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-1588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just noticed that you already said pretty much the same thing (even down to the suggested alcohol content!) in your other blog entry about Dalmore - whoops :) 

Glad to see I&#039;m not the only one who thinks this way!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed that you already said pretty much the same thing (even down to the suggested alcohol content!) in your other blog entry about Dalmore &#8211; whoops <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Glad to see I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks this way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-1587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I quite like Dalmore, but I&#039;ve got the feeling that 40 percent alcohol (which is the strength they usually go for) is not enough. Even the rather expensive King Alexander III is bottled at that strength. The taste itself is fine, but there&#039;s the same problem that you mentioned in this review: It&#039;s too watery. 
Why don&#039;t they go up to 46% or something and leave the choice of adding water to the consumer? Yeah, the price would go up a bit, but I think it would be worth it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like Dalmore, but I&#8217;ve got the feeling that 40 percent alcohol (which is the strength they usually go for) is not enough. Even the rather expensive King Alexander III is bottled at that strength. The taste itself is fine, but there&#8217;s the same problem that you mentioned in this review: It&#8217;s too watery.<br />
Why don&#8217;t they go up to 46% or something and leave the choice of adding water to the consumer? Yeah, the price would go up a bit, but I think it would be worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dalmore: Let&#8217;s Get It On &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dalmore: Let&#8217;s Get It On &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-1581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 50% American white oak and 50% Oloroso sherry casks. This still comes across much like my previous tasting notes last year. A chocolate orange hits, then gives way to wood spices and pineapple upside-down cake. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 50% American white oak and 50% Oloroso sherry casks. This still comes across much like my previous tasting notes last year. A chocolate orange hits, then gives way to wood spices and pineapple upside-down cake. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first time around, I didn&#039;t really get cherries in the Dalmore 12. If you really want cherries, you should try the Dalmore Mackenzie!

Revisiting the 12 year now, I do indeed see where you would get cherries as part of the profile.

Thanks for the comment!

Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time around, I didn&#8217;t really get cherries in the Dalmore 12. If you really want cherries, you should try the Dalmore Mackenzie!</p>
<p>Revisiting the 12 year now, I do indeed see where you would get cherries as part of the profile.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Radhakris</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Radhakris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-1508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best Fruty Single Malt Unbeliveble Cherry Flavoured]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Fruty Single Malt Unbeliveble Cherry Flavoured</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Reviews - The Dalmore 1990 Duncan Taylor &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Reviews - The Dalmore 1990 Duncan Taylor &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] find an old white box Dalmore 12 pick it up while it&#8217;s still around. Find reviews of both at Scotch Hobbyist [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find an old white box Dalmore 12 pick it up while it&#8217;s still around. Find reviews of both at Scotch Hobbyist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s definitely on my list. Only the 12 year is available locally. They&#039;re rolling out the Dalmore line very slowly across the U.S.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely on my list. Only the 12 year is available locally. They&#8217;re rolling out the Dalmore line very slowly across the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: גל גרנוב</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/07/02/dalmore-12/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[גל גרנוב]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=842#comment-417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jeff

u should try the dalmore 15.
it&#039;s devine.

i love it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff</p>
<p>u should try the dalmore 15.<br />
it&#8217;s devine.</p>
<p>i love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

