<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sampling Laphroaig Cairdeas 12 year (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Laphroaig Cask Strength comparison &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Laphroaig Cask Strength comparison &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] festival samples, including the Laphroaig Cairdeas [car-chase] 2009 release, which I did a post on here . I went to do the same this year for the 2010 release, and discovered that whiskysamples.eu had a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] festival samples, including the Laphroaig Cairdeas [car-chase] 2009 release, which I did a post on here . I went to do the same this year for the 2010 release, and discovered that whiskysamples.eu had a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anytime Jeff. Love the blog. I&#039;ll be reading.

Mickey]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime Jeff. Love the blog. I&#8217;ll be reading.</p>
<p>Mickey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments, Mickey! I agree that Laphroaig can be a humdinger. Although, it can also be quite accessible at the same time (especially the 15 and 30 year expressions).

I understand the attempt to appeal to the masses with artificial coloring, but like you said, the color means nothing in terms of taste quality. I&#039;m always happy to see a naturally colored whisky...no mater how light or dark it is.

Thanks,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Mickey! I agree that Laphroaig can be a humdinger. Although, it can also be quite accessible at the same time (especially the 15 and 30 year expressions).</p>
<p>I understand the attempt to appeal to the masses with artificial coloring, but like you said, the color means nothing in terms of taste quality. I&#8217;m always happy to see a naturally colored whisky&#8230;no mater how light or dark it is.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had Laphroaig for the first time &amp; I must share the following. This is a humdinger of a whisky! Arguably the most devastating (and I mean that in a constructive manner) of the Islay peated single malts. Perhaps you’ve noticed, a lot of Isaly whiskies come in green bottles. There is in fact a reason for that. When the bottle is green, you cannot make out the color of the whisky. If you cannot see the color, you’re purchasing decision will instead be based on the label rather than the light color of the whisky in the bottle. The majority if Islay whiskies are bourbon cask matured &amp; they are light in color. It’s a myth that the best whiskies have the darkest colors. All whiskies have magnificent ranges of flavour weather they are light or dark in color. So, never judge a whisky by it’s color!

Mickey]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had Laphroaig for the first time &amp; I must share the following. This is a humdinger of a whisky! Arguably the most devastating (and I mean that in a constructive manner) of the Islay peated single malts. Perhaps you’ve noticed, a lot of Isaly whiskies come in green bottles. There is in fact a reason for that. When the bottle is green, you cannot make out the color of the whisky. If you cannot see the color, you’re purchasing decision will instead be based on the label rather than the light color of the whisky in the bottle. The majority if Islay whiskies are bourbon cask matured &amp; they are light in color. It’s a myth that the best whiskies have the darkest colors. All whiskies have magnificent ranges of flavour weather they are light or dark in color. So, never judge a whisky by it’s color!</p>
<p>Mickey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucky you! Let me know what you think of it. 
Thanks,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky you! Let me know what you think of it.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: גל גרנוב</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[גל גרנוב]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey,
just go this baby on the mail today.
looking fwd. to tasting it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey,<br />
just go this baby on the mail today.<br />
looking fwd. to tasting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #14: Tasting Notes and Whiskey News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best in Blog #14: Tasting Notes and Whiskey News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hobbyist samples Laphroaig&#8217;s Cairdeas 2009 and Batch 001 of Laphroaig&#8217;s 10 Year Cask [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hobbyist samples Laphroaig&#8217;s Cairdeas 2009 and Batch 001 of Laphroaig&#8217;s 10 Year Cask [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops! My bad. I crossed out the &quot;batch 001&quot; so it&#039;s somewhat corrected, but your comment still makes sense. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! My bad. I crossed out the &#8220;batch 001&#8243; so it&#8217;s somewhat corrected, but your comment still makes sense. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/27/laphroaig-cairdeas-12-year-2009/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WhiskyNotes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=808#comment-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a small remark: I didn&#039;t rate the Laphroaig 10 CS batch 001 (released a couple of weeks ago), I rated the &quot;regular&quot; 10 CS (without a batch number, bottled in 2007): http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/laphroaig/laphroaig-10y-cask-strength/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small remark: I didn&#8217;t rate the Laphroaig 10 CS batch 001 (released a couple of weeks ago), I rated the &#8220;regular&#8221; 10 CS (without a batch number, bottled in 2007): <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/laphroaig/laphroaig-10y-cask-strength/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/laphroaig/laphroaig-10y-cask-strength/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

