<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caol Ila Signatory Vintage 1992, 14 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/02/caol-ila-signatory-vintage-1992-14-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/02/caol-ila-signatory-vintage-1992-14-year/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gondor</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/02/caol-ila-signatory-vintage-1992-14-year/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Gondor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=582#comment-2025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good friend of mine introduced me to Caol Ila, that same man who introduced me to scotch in general years ago. I just found bottle # 81 and am planning on giving it to him for his birthday, Looking forward to trying it myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good friend of mine introduced me to Caol Ila, that same man who introduced me to scotch in general years ago. I just found bottle # 81 and am planning on giving it to him for his birthday, Looking forward to trying it myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Port Askaig Roundup &#8211; Comparing CS, 17 and 25 year &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/02/caol-ila-signatory-vintage-1992-14-year/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Port Askaig Roundup &#8211; Comparing CS, 17 and 25 year &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=582#comment-127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I think my wife was worried about me last night as I sat surrounded by four whisky nosing glasses (Port Askaig Cask Strength (57.1%), 17 (45.8%), and 25 year (45.8%) expressions, as well as Signatory Caol Ila 14 year). I wanted to do a head-to-head and really get a feel for how these different Caol Ila expressions stack up based on my own preferences.  If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with Port Askaig (and why I&#8217;m referring to them as Caol Ilas), check out my full PA 17 review and/or this introductory post on The Whisky Exchange Blog.  In order to do the comparison, I ordered 30 ml samples of the whole Port Askaig range from whiskysamples.eu (my review of their service here). The Signatory was part of the mix just to provide a Caol Ila baseline for comparison. You can read my post on that one here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think my wife was worried about me last night as I sat surrounded by four whisky nosing glasses (Port Askaig Cask Strength (57.1%), 17 (45.8%), and 25 year (45.8%) expressions, as well as Signatory Caol Ila 14 year). I wanted to do a head-to-head and really get a feel for how these different Caol Ila expressions stack up based on my own preferences.  If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with Port Askaig (and why I&#8217;m referring to them as Caol Ilas), check out my full PA 17 review and/or this introductory post on The Whisky Exchange Blog.  In order to do the comparison, I ordered 30 ml samples of the whole Port Askaig range from whiskysamples.eu (my review of their service here). The Signatory was part of the mix just to provide a Caol Ila baseline for comparison. You can read my post on that one here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/02/caol-ila-signatory-vintage-1992-14-year/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=582#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tim,
Thanks for letting me know you&#039;ve tried this!  I googled like crazy looking for more on this bottle, as I&#039;m really liking it.  If I find another one, I&#039;ll probably grab it for when this one is gone.  

I have a post comparing the 12 to the 18, and I totally agree about preferring the 12.  If you get the opportunity to try it, Port Askaig 17 is the Caol Ila you&#039;ll wish the 18 would have been.

Cheers,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,<br />
Thanks for letting me know you&#8217;ve tried this!  I googled like crazy looking for more on this bottle, as I&#8217;m really liking it.  If I find another one, I&#8217;ll probably grab it for when this one is gone.  </p>
<p>I have a post comparing the 12 to the 18, and I totally agree about preferring the 12.  If you get the opportunity to try it, Port Askaig 17 is the Caol Ila you&#8217;ll wish the 18 would have been.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/06/02/caol-ila-signatory-vintage-1992-14-year/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 03:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=582#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got two of the other bottles (should say *had* two - now have one), and my buddy has another... 

This is an EXCELLENT expression of Caol Ila - it&#039;s more &quot;caol ila-y&quot; in ever way.  I drained the first bottle pretty quick, and have yet to uncork the 2nd - saving it for a rainy day...

Caol Ila is perhaps among my favorites - I MUCH prefer the 12 to the 18.  Don&#039;t get me wrong - I like the 18 just fine, but it&#039;s just less... Zesty/expressive.  Tamed, perhaps?  And given that this isn&#039;t a peat-monster to begin with, I think the aging in the 18 year OB makes it less... interesting/enjoyable.

I&#039;m hopeful to try a 8yr Signatory from the folks at Binny&#039;s soon - they&#039;ve got a terrific range of expressions on hand to try!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got two of the other bottles (should say *had* two &#8211; now have one), and my buddy has another&#8230; </p>
<p>This is an EXCELLENT expression of Caol Ila &#8211; it&#8217;s more &#8220;caol ila-y&#8221; in ever way.  I drained the first bottle pretty quick, and have yet to uncork the 2nd &#8211; saving it for a rainy day&#8230;</p>
<p>Caol Ila is perhaps among my favorites &#8211; I MUCH prefer the 12 to the 18.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I like the 18 just fine, but it&#8217;s just less&#8230; Zesty/expressive.  Tamed, perhaps?  And given that this isn&#8217;t a peat-monster to begin with, I think the aging in the 18 year OB makes it less&#8230; interesting/enjoyable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hopeful to try a 8yr Signatory from the folks at Binny&#8217;s soon &#8211; they&#8217;ve got a terrific range of expressions on hand to try!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

