<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Caol Ila 12 and 18</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 04:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=548#comment-1308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the update, Gal! I&#039;ve come to like the 18 year better than I did at first, but only when I drink it on its own. It doesn&#039;t do as well if I drink it side-by-side with the 12 year. Kind of like drinking Ardbeg ANB and Ardbeg 10.

What did you think of the CS?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update, Gal! I&#8217;ve come to like the 18 year better than I did at first, but only when I drink it on its own. It doesn&#8217;t do as well if I drink it side-by-side with the 12 year. Kind of like drinking Ardbeg ANB and Ardbeg 10.</p>
<p>What did you think of the CS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gal</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=548#comment-1304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey jeff
doing the same 12,18,CS comparison now with my new CI sample kit.
i agree. the 12 is better and offers more OOMPH then the 18. i was kind disappointed by the 18 expecting so much of it.
now i am going to sample the CS....
;)

nighty!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey jeff<br />
doing the same 12,18,CS comparison now with my new CI sample kit.<br />
i agree. the 12 is better and offers more OOMPH then the 18. i was kind disappointed by the 18 expecting so much of it.<br />
now i am going to sample the CS&#8230;. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>nighty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=548#comment-1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, I like that &quot;clean and lean&quot; Ardbeg comment. That&#039;s a very good way of describing it. I really like Ardbeg as well, but there is a bit of Anise/licorice that I could do without. Like you say, the Caol Ila 12 is a bit more simple, but I like everything that it has to offer!

I agree with you very much on Lagavulin 16 and HP 18, two of my highest rated whiskies. 

I do like Glenfarclas 17 quite a bit as well, though. In fact, after being underwhelmed by Glenfarclas 10 and 21, I was surprised by just how much I enjoyed the 17 year. I like it in the same way I like a good Cognac...great as a &quot;dessert&quot; whisky.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the CI 12!

Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I like that &#8220;clean and lean&#8221; Ardbeg comment. That&#8217;s a very good way of describing it. I really like Ardbeg as well, but there is a bit of Anise/licorice that I could do without. Like you say, the Caol Ila 12 is a bit more simple, but I like everything that it has to offer!</p>
<p>I agree with you very much on Lagavulin 16 and HP 18, two of my highest rated whiskies. </p>
<p>I do like Glenfarclas 17 quite a bit as well, though. In fact, after being underwhelmed by Glenfarclas 10 and 21, I was surprised by just how much I enjoyed the 17 year. I like it in the same way I like a good Cognac&#8230;great as a &#8220;dessert&#8221; whisky.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the CI 12!</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yamazaki</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yamazaki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=548#comment-1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I purchased a bottle of Cao Ila 12 a few days ago.  Since then, I have spent a quite bit of quality time with it.  :-)  At about $55 here (Oregon), it is a solid pick.  A very good value.  

It is not that complex.  But to me, it is  &quot;clean and lean&quot; Ardbeg.   It has some spice.  And there is something very nice in the aftertaste, just right before it fades away....  I can&#039;t put my finger on it.  But that aftertaste brings me back to it over and over again. 

Do I like it as much as Lagavulin 16?  No.  But still very good.  In the same league as Ardbeg 10.  I am pretty happy with it. 

Full disclosure:

My favorite: Lagavulin 16 and Highland Park 18
Not my cup of tea:  Glenfarclas 17.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased a bottle of Cao Ila 12 a few days ago.  Since then, I have spent a quite bit of quality time with it.  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   At about $55 here (Oregon), it is a solid pick.  A very good value.  </p>
<p>It is not that complex.  But to me, it is  &#8220;clean and lean&#8221; Ardbeg.   It has some spice.  And there is something very nice in the aftertaste, just right before it fades away&#8230;.  I can&#8217;t put my finger on it.  But that aftertaste brings me back to it over and over again. </p>
<p>Do I like it as much as Lagavulin 16?  No.  But still very good.  In the same league as Ardbeg 10.  I am pretty happy with it. </p>
<p>Full disclosure:</p>
<p>My favorite: Lagavulin 16 and Highland Park 18<br />
Not my cup of tea:  Glenfarclas 17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caol Ila Grudge Match: 12 Year vs. 18 Year &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caol Ila Grudge Match: 12 Year vs. 18 Year &#124; Whisky Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=548#comment-215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scotch Hobbyist finds it more mild than I did, but enjoyable.  He also thinks that refreshing scent on the nose is lemons and a peppery flavor that I didn&#8217;t detect at all. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scotch Hobbyist finds it more mild than I did, but enjoyable.  He also thinks that refreshing scent on the nose is lemons and a peppery flavor that I didn&#8217;t detect at all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caol Ila Signatory Vintage 1992, 14 years &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caol Ila Signatory Vintage 1992, 14 years &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=548#comment-57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  I was planning to buy a full size bottle of Caol Ila 12 soon, anyway.  I know I just finished a Caol Ila 12 vs. 18 comparison, but I couldn&#8217;t resist trying this bottle out right [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  I was planning to buy a full size bottle of Caol Ila 12 soon, anyway.  I know I just finished a Caol Ila 12 vs. 18 comparison, but I couldn&#8217;t resist trying this bottle out right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #6: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/30/comparing-caol-ila-12-and-18/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best in Blog #6: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=548#comment-54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scotch Hobbyist does a direct comparison of Caol Ila 12 and Caol Ila 18 year. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scotch Hobbyist does a direct comparison of Caol Ila 12 and Caol Ila 18 year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

