<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosebank 1991, 17 year (SMS) &#8211; Get it while you can</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/17/rosebank-1991-17-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/17/rosebank-1991-17-year/</link>
	<description>Learning about the wonderful world of whisk(e)y and sharing the journey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasting Notes: Rosebank 17; 1991 Vintage &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/17/rosebank-1991-17-year/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tasting Notes: Rosebank 17; 1991 Vintage &#124; Whisky Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=360#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scotch Hobbyist thought rather more of this dram than I did (tasting from the same miniature bottling).     Share and Enjoy: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scotch Hobbyist thought rather more of this dram than I did (tasting from the same miniature bottling).     Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Following Feis Ile, and revisiting some earlier posts &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/17/rosebank-1991-17-year/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Following Feis Ile, and revisiting some earlier posts &#171; Scotch Hobbyist&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=360#comment-40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] allergies last week, and I think it dulled my senses a bit.  This weekend, I revisited the Rosebank 1991 and Port Askaig 17 that I wrote about during the week, and had a couple of things jump out at me [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] allergies last week, and I think it dulled my senses a bit.  This weekend, I revisited the Rosebank 1991 and Port Askaig 17 that I wrote about during the week, and had a couple of things jump out at me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #4: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/17/rosebank-1991-17-year/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best in Blog #4: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 04:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=360#comment-38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hobbyist gets his hands on some Port Askaig 17 year, as well as some Rosebank 17. I&#8217;ve got some of that myself this week - look for notes in a few [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hobbyist gets his hands on some Port Askaig 17 year, as well as some Rosebank 17. I&#8217;ve got some of that myself this week &#8211; look for notes in a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Hobbyist</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/17/rosebank-1991-17-year/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotch Hobbyist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=360#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the feedback, Nick!  I&#039;m glad you liked the Talisker 18 post, too.

I certainly don&#039;t make a habit of including retail links to the whiskies I talk about, but in this case, that was the only other source of notes I could find for this particular bottling.

Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, Nick!  I&#8217;m glad you liked the Talisker 18 post, too.</p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t make a habit of including retail links to the whiskies I talk about, but in this case, that was the only other source of notes I could find for this particular bottling.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://scotchhobbyist.com/2009/05/17/rosebank-1991-17-year/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotchhobbyist.com/?p=360#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I most definitely am going to have to search for this one, as I completely agreed and loved your review of the Talisker 18. 
 
As to your question about linking to an online alcohol retailer, deep linking into a website is often frowned on, but I was surprised that they didn&#039;t have an age verification so I would say it&#039;s not a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I most definitely am going to have to search for this one, as I completely agreed and loved your review of the Talisker 18. </p>
<p>As to your question about linking to an online alcohol retailer, deep linking into a website is often frowned on, but I was surprised that they didn&#8217;t have an age verification so I would say it&#8217;s not a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

